<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/tresources/styles/tendenci-rss.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Bolton &amp;amp; Baer Ltd. and Bolton Real Estate Consultants, Ltd. - Articles</title>
<itunes:subtitle>Bolton &amp;amp; Baer Ltd. and Bolton Real Estate Consultants, Ltd. Article RSS</itunes:subtitle>
<link>http://www.bbrec.com</link>
<description>Bolton &amp;amp; Baer Ltd. and Bolton Real Estate Consultants, Ltd. Article RSS feed. .</description>
<itunes:author>Bolton &amp;amp; Baer Ltd. and Bolton Real Estate Consultants, Ltd.</itunes:author>

<itunes:image href="http://www.bbrec.com/tresources/en/images/icons/tendenci34x15.gif" />
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
<copyright>Copyright 2005, Bolton &amp;amp; Baer Ltd. and Bolton Real Estate Consultants, Ltd.</copyright>
<generator>Tendenci Membership Management Software by Schipul - The Web Marketing Company</generator>
<language>en-us</language>
<webMaster>noemail@bbrec.com</webMaster>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:31:41 GMT</pubDate>
		<item>

			<category>Articles</category>
			<link>http://www.bbrec.com/en/art/22/</link>
			<title>Who Needs USPAP When You Have the Texas Supreme Court</title>
			<description>&lt;div&gt;This paper addresses the sharp differences in Texas between fair market value appraising, the process and reporting standards for which are squarely set out in the Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice (USPAP), and condemnation appraising, particularly in partial taking acquisitions, the increasingly obtuse rules for which have been defined and redefined in recent years by the Texas Supreme Court. The paper&#8217;s thesis is that the safeguards USPAP attempts to establish so that appraisers in Texas and elsewhere will fully, fairly and uniformly consider all appropriate appraisal techniques, methodologies and relevant data in developing fair market value appraisals that realistically reflect the market value of the property being appraised are frustrated to a significant extent by certain, most recent, Supreme Court rulings that prevent a full and straightforward application of the fair market value standard.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/attachments/articles/22/articleWhoNeeds.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;View complete article&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;[ Adobe Acrobat pdf file, 92kb ]&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;img height=&quot;31&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;5&quot; src=&quot;/attachments/articles/1/getacro.gif&quot; width=&quot;88&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
 
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;6-Feb-03 11:00 AM
</description>
			<itunes:subtitle>Who Needs USPAP When You Have the Texas Supreme Court</itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:summary>&lt;div&gt;This paper addresses the sharp differences in Texas between fair market value appraising, the process and reporting standards for which are squarely set out in the Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice (USPAP), and condemnation appraising, particularly in partial taking acquisitions, the increasingly obtuse rules for which have been defined and redefined in recent years by the Texas Supreme Court. The paper&#8217;s thesis is that the safeguards USPAP attempts to establish so that appraisers in Texas and elsewhere will fully, fairly and uniformly consider all appropriate appraisal techniques, methodologies and relevant data in developing fair market value appraisals that realistically reflect the market value of the property being appraised are frustrated to a significant extent by certain, most recent, Supreme Court rulings that prevent a full and straightforward application of the fair market value standard.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/attachments/articles/22/articleWhoNeeds.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;View complete article&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;[ Adobe Acrobat pdf file, 92kb ]&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;img height=&quot;31&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; hspace=&quot;5&quot; src=&quot;/attachments/articles/1/getacro.gif&quot; width=&quot;88&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</itunes:summary>
<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bbrec.com/en/art/22/</guid>
			<author>David Bolton & Kent Sick </author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2003 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
		</item>

</channel></rss>